Archive for December, 2006

The Women of Doctor Who

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

The featurettes on the new Doctor Who original series DVDs have been a trial to get through at times — you often feel as if the producers shot 55 minutes of interviews and used everything they shot. But there are some wonderfully revealing bits in some of them, and I’ve especially gained a new appreciation for some of the women working behind the scenes on the show.

For one thing, there’s Alice Frick, who took part in the early BBC meetings that came up with many of the concepts that would later become the basis of Doctor Who.

More importantly, the first producer of Doctor Who, Verity Lambert, was a 28-year-old newbie producer who faced down institutional sexism and rigidity to push her own vision of the show. She was originally saddled with an older executive producer, Rex Tucker, who tried to push her around. As she explained in an interview in the DVD featurette Doctor Who: Origins (on the Beginning box set), Tucker didn’t expect Lambert to push back:

From the time I arrived it was quite obvious that he and I didn’t agree on anything… we didn’t agree on casting. We didn’t agree on what sort of input I was going to have… I think he’d been led to believe that really there was this young producer coming in and he could hold her hand and make all the decisions. I’m afraid I wasn’t that sort of person.

Lambert also had to stare down her bosses, when they tried to pull the plug on the Daleks in Doctor Who’s second story. She had to battle with other departments at the BBC that tried to starve the show of resources due to petty turf battles. Doctor Who wouldn’t have lasted a dozen episodes if Lambert hadn’t been willing to kick a lot of ass. You also get the impression that the show would have been a lot more “educational” and less focused on being a really intense drama.

That featurette also showcases Delia Derbyshire, who turned Ron Grainer’s score for the show’s theme tune into a novel piece of electronic music. The well-known rumblety rumblety woooo of the theme tune owes much more to Derbyshire than Grainer. She painstakingly pasted together pieces of tape and electronic noises to make the arrangement of the theme tune that lasted from 1963 to 1980. Here’s an amazing video of her explaining how she cuts and pastes different sounds to create music. Record companies wouldn’t hire her in the early 60s because she was a woman, but she’s now regarded as one of the pioneers of electronic music.

Finally, I was really blown away by Paddy Russell, who directed a bunch of Who stories in the 60s and 70s. She was one of the first female production assistants at the BBC and then one of the first female directors. She was definitely the first woman to direct Doctor Who, and had to deal with the notorious diva William Hartnell. In the featurette on her directing career (on the Horror of Fang Rock DVD) she talks about how she used the fact that Hartnell was also playing the Doctor’s doppelganger to keep him off guard. She also had to convince Tom Baker to dress up like a mummy in Pyramids of Mars. On the Mars DVD, there’s some great stuff about how Russell and Elisabeth Sladen (who played companion Sarah Jane Smith) rewrote the scripts to make Sarah smarter. In several instances, they gave Sarah some of the Doctor’s lines, so instead of asking him what was up, she was figuring it out for herself.

Doctor Who has a much-deserved reputation for sexism, in both its old and new incarnations. But it’s cool to realize that some totally kick-ass pioneers worked on the show behind the scenes.

Watch Aomowa on Wired Science Jan. 3!

Friday, December 15th, 2006

Female geeks are taking over the world! OK, we’re just taking over PBS. Aomowa Shields, who wrote an essay about her career as an astronomer for She’s Such a Geek, is going to be a correspondent on Wired magazine’s new PBS show, Wired Science. Go, Aomowa! The first episode will air Jan. 3.

Watch Wired Science Jan. 3 [via Wired Science Blog]

Scholarship to CMU for women in information security

Friday, December 15th, 2006

One of the areas where women are most underrepresented in the computer industry is security. This also happens to be one of the fastest-growing and highest-paying fields as well. Now there’s good news for women in computer science who want to get trained up in network security issues: Carnegie Mellon University is partnering with the Executive Women’s Forum and Information Networking Institute to offer a full scholarship to one woman who wants to get a master’s degree in Information Security Technology and Management at CMU’s CyLab.

If you’re interested, you can find out more about the scholarship here. Deadline is Feb. 15, 2007. Pass it on!

“The biggest obstacle was brute force”

Sunday, December 10th, 2006

There’s progress on women’s representation in the sciences, but not fast enough or significant enough. That’s the overarching message of a new Newsweek article and a recent talk by North Carolina State University professor Mary Wyer. The Newsweek article looks at the rising number of female faculty members in the UC Berkeley physics department, but notes that they still only account for 10 percent of professors. The article sees signs of hope in the 20 percent of physics undergrad and grad students who are female. (Although one thing that jumped out at me when I was co-editing essays for She’s Such A Geek was the fact that many women made it to grad school, at the top of their classes, and then found massive barriers suddenly in their way. The article goes on to say:

To women in other professions—law, publishing, even politics—academic science can sometimes seem like the world that time forgot. Decades after women began scaling the corporate ladder, female physicists, chemists, mathematicians and engineers are still struggling to find their place at the nation’s major research universities. Although women now earn about half the graduate degrees in math and chemistry, for example, they hold only about 10 percent of the faculty jobs in those fields. “The U.S. needs as much scientific and technologic brain power as it can get,” says Georgia Tech’s Sue Rosser, author of “The Science Glass Ceiling.” “It makes no sense to exclude half the population.”

The article also talks about the “biological clock” and steps that some universities have taken to allow for women scientists to have children. It also talks about a study that found women professors were making less than men in the sciences, and steps some institutions have made to counteract that bias. And then there’s my favorite quote in the article, from Berkeley physics grad student Lorraine Sadler:

“The biggest obstacle I’ve had is brute force,” says Sadler. “Most of the things in this lab are heavy, so I started lifting weights.” She looks proudly around the sophisticated equipment that records her experiments. “I built this entire lab from an empty room,” she says.

Meanwhile, Wyer blamed biases against women for keeping them out of the sciences. She ran a study at NC State which divided a required ecology course into three groups. One group had a lot of material about women’s contributions to science and bias against women incorporated into the course, complete with quizzes. A second group had less material from women’s studies classes. A third group had no extra material about women. She surveyed each group at the start and end of the semester, and found that each group’s attitudes to women in science had changed commensurate with the amount of material it studied. (The group that had no extra material showed no change in its attitudes.)

Actually, I’m not sure what lesson we’re supposed to take away from that study, except maybe that talking about women in science, and educating people about women’s potential in the sciences, is a Good Thing.

etymology

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

Since bringing my copy of She’s Such A Geek to work, I’ve been continuously asked to define the differences between geek, nerd and dork.

One fellow labmate insists vigorously that she’s not a geek because she’s too aware of pop culture and too busy filling the persona of the devil-on-your-shoulder. (Frankly, I don’t see a conflict between this and geekery at all).
Where do you draw the lines between nerd and geek? Are they one and the same?

More gifts for girls

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

Several days ago on this blog Ellen Spertus suggested several subversive gifts for girls, and several commenters offered other good ideas as well.

I’d like to add a few more suggestions:

Fun, molecularly-inspired jewelry and clothing can be found at Made With Molecules. What becomes a female geek better than a pair of estrogen earrings?

I’m neither an astronomer nor a biologist, but I can’t decide whether Bathsheba Grossman’s science crystal of the large scale model of the universe or DNA polymerase is cooler. If you can’t make up your mind yet, just buy a couple of DNA keychains as stocking stuffers and get a Julia set as a birthday present.

Since I’m actually more of a nerd than a geek (I tried to be a true geek, I really did, but I had to come out of the closet and admit that I actually prefer stories to physics equations), I really enjoy books that blend science with amazing stories and captivating artwork. One wonderful book that I’ve seen is A Gap in Nature: Discovering the World’s Extinct Animals, full of gorgeous illustrations and brief stories about animals that once roamed the earth but are no more. Not the cheeriest thought, of course, but are we not doomed to repeat the mistakes if we do not read the cautionary tales? On a cheerier note, though, the same author-illustrator team published another book of esoterica about the animal world that lives today: Astonishing Animals: Extraordinary Creatures and the Fascinating Worlds They Inhabit. I’ve not seen this book myself, but it sounds delightful, and even with a bit of of a challenge: they’ve made up one of the creatures, and try to guess which one!

That last topic reminds me of the monkey-picked tea that we gave as a gift once from a British purveyor of exotic foodstuffs called Edible. Gifts here would not be for the picky eater, unless she’s Wednesday Addams.

And for Christmas next July: SF Bay Area author Wendy Lichtman has written a story for children in which the female protagonist uses math to solve a mystery, Do the Math: Secrets, Lies, and Algebra. I’ve not read it myself, but my writing group instructor who is a protege of Lichtman says that she totally got into the story despite being math-phobic. Maybe this can be our way of roping girls into the female geek lifestyle….

Geeky Theraphy

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006

For the past three weeks, I’ve been going through a lot of emotional upheavals. I’m in the verge of a break up with a man I’ve been with since high school, I’m being rejected by the girls I’ve started an anime club with this year and on top of that, I’m in the middle of Fall finals.

I’ve been questioning who I am because of all this. However, despite the fact that I’ve been feeling like utter crap lately, I’ve found my solstice in my geekiness. I felt like this was the only thing that hasn’t changed about me and the only thing that hasn’t been questioned. I just received my copy of the book and it really reminded me of this. I’m still the geeky gamer girl and I’m so happy to read about other women who are just as geeky, if not more.

So, I’ve been immersing myself into gaming as a means of empowerment. I just beat the first boss in the game, Okami, for the Playstation 2 and I felt so much better because I just overcame a challenge. Beating small challenges made tackling much bigger ones more comfortable, like writing a 12 page paper or dealing with a break up. When bigger challenges become too much, I go back to my games. I’ve come to see this as my geeky therapy- letting out frustrations on demons in Okami, I think, is better than taking the anger out on another person or a good piece of furniture.

My geekiness has kept me afloat through some rough times. Now, I really want to work harder to make my geekiness the best it can be—mastering my games and becoming a successful web designer. I’m even thinking of starting a female gamers club on campus or at least, finding a group of girl gamers around UCLA to play with. Hopefully, somewhere in this process, I can reaffirm who I am and not feel so beaten down.

Does anyone else have a form of geeky therapy?

Why men love science fiction

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006

An article printed last year in The Observer (London) recently surfaced on a UK scifi blog. The author, who seems to think that science fiction is comprised entirely of Star Trek and Star Wars, says there are more male than female SF fans because men like “order” and science fiction is orderly:

The appeal of the sci fi system to the ordinary fan lies not just in its orderliness, but in its finiteness. You can watch every single episode of Star Trek and learn everything there is to know about it. You can contain an entire universe in lists and DVDs. The kind of universe that is knowable by heart is much less threatening than the real universe outside, off screen, full of unpredictability and disorder.

It is my contention that the reassurance offered by a system of order, internal coherence, completability and collectability – a universe that can be put in alphabetical order – is particularly appealing to men . . .
Whether by social conditioning or nature women seem better able to adjust in adulthood to the irksome imperfection of the universe . . . I can only speak for my own gender, and I can reveal that men are mostly dragged kicking and screaming into grown-upness. They never give up the secret hope that complexity will go away and leave them alone. They take refuge in trivia because facts, nice orderly facts, are psychological balm to the friction burns inflicted by contact with real life.

There’s the old chestnut that men hate being grown-ups, but somehow women don’t mind it. Then there’s the extreme misunderstanding of science fiction itself, a genre which is full of ambiguity, plotholes, infinite complexity, and disorder. What’s amusing is that this guy is really talking about world-building, a practice more often associated with fantasy than science fiction. And fantasy is a genre full of extremely successful female authors.

Why men love SF [via SciFi.UK.com]

What am I allowed to be when I grow up?

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006

I never wanted to be a professor. That’s why I didn’t go to graduate school immediately from undergrad; academia was not calling me. When I did apply, I had a whole metaphysical argument mapped out for why an education in science would perfectly outfit me for a career in humanitarian aid. I firmly believe I will be just as much a scientist no matter where I work or what I do.

But I’m starting to feel personally responsible for fixing the gender gap.

Over 40% of the students and post-docs here are women. The faculty seems to be roughly 12% women. We talk about this discrepancy privately (in equal parts anxiety, anger and resignation). We talk about it publicly (at meetings for the new grad women in science association, at departmental retreats). The questions are always: “How do we change the ratios? How do we ensure more women make it to the top?”

What is the answer if not “By staying in academia yourselves”?

Am I doing a disservice to all girls and women in science if I drop out of academia? Am I merely contributing to the problem? Most of all, after all my ranting and raving about the gender inequities, how can I justify not staying to fix them?

Tonight I’m supposed to meet my two new undergraduate mentees – matched with me by the aforementioned grad women’s group. What do I tell them? “Yes, stay in science! Girls can do it! (But actually, I’m leaving)”? What kind of role model does that make me?

No girls allowed in Silicon Valley

Monday, December 4th, 2006

valleyboy.jpgRather belatedly, I read the Business Week article about Web 2.0 companies that featured Kevin Rose from Digg.com and various other young entrepreneurs. A sidebar in the article was called “Valley Boys,” and featured a bunch of up-and-coming tech companies (including BitTorrent, Facebook, and LiveJournal) run by BOYS. No girls allowed. Who cares if people like Mary Hodder (Dabble) and Di-ann Eisnor (Platial) are raising good chunks of VC and angel money for their cool Web 2.0 companies? They aren’t BOYS. The worst part was that in a couple of the pictures of the “valley boys” they had women’s bodies in the images as eye candy. My favorite (pictured above) is of Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook, staring at the rack on a headless chick. WTF?

It’s so frustrating to be reading an article about a tech space that I’m actually interested in, and discover that the people covering the space are so frakkin clueless that they couldn’t even be bothered to take the “no girls allowed” sign off their clubhouse. Wake up, dorks. There are women in the tech industry, including entrepreneurs and VCs, and they are not amused.

Valley Boys [Business Week]